Performance Testing News UK

Continuity Disaster Recovery Software Will get Non-public Cloud Advisor

No Comments

From eWeek- Storage:

Disaster recovery provider Continuity Software Aug. sixteen upgraded its RecoverGuard product to incorporate a Personal Cloud Advisor.

RecoverGuard Model 5.2’s Private Cloud Advisor supplies full availability and recoverability in the personal cloud, or pool of shared data storage.

Non-public cloud computing is a method some companies make use of to make use of secure, in-house IT services via virtualized software program, similar to VMware’s ESX servers. Non-public clouds have pros and cons.

While largely efficient for consolidating servers—and hence costs—personal clouds could be a bear to manage because the abstraction layers generated by digital machines (VMs) trigger single points of failure, resulting in compromises in service availability.

Moreover, attaining high availability in a private cloud is commonly troublesome because it means visualizing, mapping and managing all of the shifting components.

The plot thickens as virtual machines aren’t “storage aware,” which means every VM does not know the infrastructure it sits on.

Oracle Takes on With Google

No Comments

From eWeek:

Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 likely wont benefit from Oracles patent-infringement lawsuit towards Google, which can have an effect on Android, however almost certainly not soon sufficient to affect the close to-time period smartphone wars. – Google has vowed to “strongly defend” open-source requirements and its Android operating system from an mental property lawsuit by Oracle, which sued the search-engine giant Aug. 12 for allegedly infringing on seven patents and different copyrights related to Java. And whereas a lot of the Oracle-Google…

University is testing sign language over cellular networks

No Comments

From cNet:

At the University of Washington MobileASL that uses motion detection to determine American Signal Language and transmit images over U.S. cell networks is being tested…

Open compliance programme for Linux

No Comments

From Computerweekly:

An open compliance programme has been launched by the Linux Foundation to help people using open source software comply with licensing.

Cloud Based Testing

No Comments

From CNet:

Among the most extremely trafficked interactive techniques in the present day are accessed via the Net: Amazon.com, Facebook, Google, Zynga simply to call a few. These apps need to work flawlessly throughout any browser or danger dropping eyeballs and audience consistency.

The browser wars in spite of everything, are still alive and properly, and any critical Web utility must work on the most popular browsers , comparable to Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Chrome but do not forget others like Safari and Opera.

However for many companies, it is troublesome and costly to take care of and update a check infrastructure on premise that retains up with the top browsers and all their releases, major and maintenance. Like growth and deployment before it, the time has come for cross-browser testing to maneuver to the cloud.

Earlier this year, start-up Sauce Labs launched Sauce OnDemand, a cloud service that allows users to execute their Selenium scripts in parallel across 10 of immediately’s hottest browsers. In accordance with Jason Huggins, the creator of Selenium and co-founding father of Sauce Labs, browser testing is a see-it-to-consider-it type of thing. Builders are used to seeing exams working locally however usually lose that visibility when testing moves to the cloud.

Sauce Labs on Thursday is anticipated to introduce Sauce TV

Windows Safety Bug Surfaces as Patch Tuesday Looms

No Comments

From Security – eWeek:

A new zero-day bug affecting Home windows 7, XP and other variations of the operating system has been reported a couple of brief days before Microsoft releases probably the most Patch Tuesday safety bulletins ever. – Microsoft is investigating a brand new report of a securityvulnerability in Windows that may be exploited to achieve elevated privileges.
Microsoft confirmed that the bug, a privilege escalation
problem in the operating system’s kernel driver, is being analyzed. Danish
safety firm Secunia printed an a…

Saudi regulator delays BlackBerry ban {to test|to check}

No Comments

From Yahoo News:

EDDAH, Saudi Arabia (AFP) – Saudi’s telecoms regulator has postponed a ban on BlackBerry till Monday in order that steered options to the dominion’s security issues supplied by the Canadian maker may be tested.

The Communications and Data Expertise Fee stated the forty eight-hour grace period, ending on Monday evening, was given “to test the prompt options,” a statement carried by SPA state news agency late on Saturday said.

The CITC resolution was additionally based on the “ongoing efforts by the suppliers of cell companies to fulfill the requirements of the commission’s regulations.”

Extra Than 1 in 10 Mozilla Bug Finders Turn Down Money (PC World)

No Comments

From Yahoo News:

The open-source Mozilla has been offering money bounties for safety bugs for six years now, but typically bug finders merely flip down the cash.

Between 10 p.c and 15 percent of the serious safety bugs reported since Mozilla launched its bug bounty program have been supplied freed from cost, based on Mozilla. “Lots of people would say, ‘Don’t worry about it. Donate it to the EFF [Digital Frontier Basis] or simply send me a T-shirt,’” stated Johnathan Nightingale, the director of Firefox development, in a latest interview.

Mozilla was a pioneer on this area. It began offering a US$500 bounty for security bugs in August 2004. Since then, it is had greater than a hundred and twenty bugs reported by about eighty researchers. The mission just lately upped its bounty and is now paying out a maximum of $3,000 for vital security bugs. A number of weeks later, Google announced that it, too, would pay as much as $3,000 for security bugs reported in its products.

“It has been a extremely successful program for us. We’re actually happy with it,” Nightingale said.

Sarcastically, it’s Mozilla — the challenge that is been built on free contributions — that pays bounties for bugs, while its biggest competitor — Microsoft — has to date refused to pay out.

Mozilla does not pay for the vast majority of bugs that get reported — just for security flaws — and builders do not complain, Nightingale said. “Security bugs are in contrast to other things,” he said. “There are other markets.”

A short description of NTLM

No Comments

NTLM is a security protocol used in Microsoft Networks. It is the main approach used by Microsoft to implement single sign-on. It is also used for HTTP authentication and also in Exchange, as well as CIFS/SMB, Telnet and SIP.

NTLM uses a challenge response authentication mechanism, in which users are able to establish their identity without the use of a password. This is generally handled by a certificate that the user already had in their poccession. It includes three exchanges, in general known as Type1 (negotiation), Type2 (challenge) and Type3 (authentication). The exchanges work on the following basis.
The client generates and sends a Type 1 communication to the server. This contains a feature supported by the client and requested of from the server.
The server responds with a Type 2 communication. This contains the features decided to be supported by the server. More notably however, it contains a challenge generated by the server.
The client responds to the challenge with a Type 3 communication. This contains a number of pieces of data about the client, including the domain and users name of the client user along with the secret key. This secret key that has been sent should match the secret key that is held by the server.

Finally Digital signatures can be managed. This means that the signed message has not been intercepted and means the sender is privy to the shared secret. This could be a Radius client interating along with Active Directory whereby the shared secret is manually set within each configuration by the administrator. The keys used in signing and sealing are established as a by-product of the NTLM authentication process. Signing functionality is performed by the addition of a Message Authentication Code (MAC) to any message. This is checked by the server who can now be certain that the message integrity is safe. The signature is generated using the secret key, known by both the sender and receiver. The MAC can only be checked by any party holding the key.

Sealing is carried out by a different function, which adds encryption to a message to put a stop to it from being viewed by another party in transit. There are several encryption protocols used throughout signing and sealing, plus more are appearing frequently. As well as providing message integrity, communication discretion is ensured by the use of sealing. Under SSPI (Security Support Provider Interface) sealing (and signing) is at all times performed in combination with the same key. This encryption allows that a message cannot be intercepted or tampered with whatsoever. (Unless of course you are employed for the FBI).

NTLM is a popular authentication protocol. While there are other authentication protocols that are used, the straightforwardness of use and it’s integration with Microsoft leaves it as nearly all administrators number 1 choice.

The Return of Investment of PC and how it compares to a bus

No Comments

From HP:

Steve Feloney is the face of HP’s Performance Centre. I met Stephen a year ago as he was doing a world tour to endorse Performance Centre. Stephen is passionate about Performance Centre. He does his work well, and you can’t avoid agreeing with him about Performance Centre and its value.

Now Stephen has written an article about PC and how you can get a great Return of Investment (ROI) even though PC is itself very dear to buy.

It goes something like this……If you were to travel from London to Rome, a car would be a very nice idea. To get a car, it will price you a lot of cash to buy one, but it is much easier than doing the journey by foot. It would take two months to walk, and as a extremely well paid IT worker, the overall cost of the voyage in terms of lost income would without difficulty cover the price of a car.

To my mind, there are other forms of transport like public transport. It is a much less expensive option, however, the voyage is longer and a lot less comfortable. That is the same with PC, you don’t necessarily have to obtain the best possible option, you can look downmarket and that will pretty much facilitate you to achieve the same ends.

You can make up your own mind.